PageIndex
Retrieval with no vector database: build the document a table of contents and let the model read its way in
What is PageIndex?
Vector search finds passages that resemble the question, and resemblance is not relevance — on a long regulatory filing the paragraph that answers a question often shares almost no vocabulary with it. PageIndex drops the vector store. It builds a tree of the document's real structure, section by section, and then has a model walk that tree the way a person would use a table of contents: narrowing down, opening the part that should hold the answer, reading it. Nothing is chunked, and every answer points at the section it came from. The trade is per-query cost, since retrieval now involves reasoning rather than a lookup, and the design targets long individual documents rather than a corpus of short ones.
What can you do with PageIndex?
- Retrieve by reasoning, not by resemblance — A model decides which section should hold the answer and opens it, so a passage that answers the question in different words is still found.
- Keep natural sections instead of fixed chunks — The unit of retrieval is a real section of the document, so a definition and the clause that depends on it do not end up in separate fragments.
- Show where an answer came from — Every result names the part of the tree it was read from, which is the difference between an answer you can check and one you have to trust.
- Skip the vector database entirely — There is no index to build, embed, tune or keep in sync — a document is submitted and the tree is what gets stored.
- Build the tree in seconds when structure is obvious — A faster mode extracts the structure from the document itself rather than asking a model to infer it, for material with a clean table of contents.
- Run it locally or against the hosted service — The same client indexes and retrieves on your own machine with your own model key, or points at the maintainers' cloud without a code change.
Before you choose PageIndex
- Retrieval itself costs model calls, so each query is slower and more expensive than a vector lookup — the calculation changes if you serve many cheap queries rather than a few expensive ones.
- It is aimed at long, well-structured professional documents; a corpus of short unstructured pages has little tree to reason over, and the vendor's headline accuracy figure comes from a financial-document benchmark.
Frequently asked questions
Is PageIndex free for commercial use?
PageIndex is released under the MIT licence — OSI-approved open source, which permits commercial use.
How can PageIndex be deployed?
PageIndex is available as Runs locally / Self-hosted / Managed cloud.
Documentation
Reproduced from the VectifyAI/PageIndex README, published under MIT. Read the original ↗
PageIndex: Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG
- [2026/08] 🔥 PageIndex SDK:
pip install -U pageindexnow ships local mode: index, retrieve, and chat entirely on your machine with your own LLM key, or point the same client at PageIndex Cloud with an API key. - [2026/08] ⚡ PageIndex Flash: tree structure generation from PDFs in seconds, with structure extracted heuristically instead of by an LLM.
- PageIndex Chat: a human-like document analysis agent for long professional documents. Also available via MCP or API.
What is PageIndex?
Are you frustrated with vector database retrieval accuracy for long and complex documents? Vector-based RAG retrieves by semantic similarity. But similarity ≠ relevance — what retrieval actually needs is relevance, and relevance requires reasoning. On professional documents that demand contextual understanding, domain expertise, and multi-step reasoning, similarity search misses what is relevant but not similar, and returns what is similar but not relevant.
Inspired by AlphaGo, PageIndex replaces the vector index with a hierarchical tree index and lets an LLM reason its way through it, the way a human expert turns to and reads the right section of a long report. Retrieval happens in two steps:
- Index: generate a tree-structure index for each document
- Retrieve: search that tree with LLM reasoning, agentically
Why it works
PageIndex is a vectorless, reasoning-based RAG engine that mirrors how humans read, delivering traceable, explainable, and context-aware retrieval, without vector databases or chunking.
Compare with Vector RAG
| Vector RAG | PageIndex | |
|---|---|---|
| Index | vector index | tree index |
| Unit | fixed-size chunks | natural sections |
| Retrieval | semantic similarity search | LLM reasoning over the tree |
| Result | opaque, “vibe retrieval” | traceable to explicit references |
| Context | query embedding only | full context: conversation history, domain knowledge, etc. |
It is ideal for financial reports, legal documents, regulatory filings, technical manuals, medical literature, academic textbooks, and any other long, complex professional document.
PageIndex achieved state-of-the-art 98.7% accuracy on FinanceBench (financial document QA benchmark), vastly outperforming vector-based RAG (see Benchmarks).
Quickstart
pip install -U pageindex
import os
from pageindex import PageIndexClient
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"
client = PageIndexClient(
index="gpt-5.6-luna", # model to build the tree index
chat="gpt-5.6-sol", # model to search the tree
)
doc_id = client.submit_document("report.pdf")["doc_id"]
answer = client.chat("What was the 2023 operating margin, and where is it stated?",
doc_id=doc_id)
print(answer)
Model Recommendations
index=: a basic model is sufficient. The index model generates the document’s tree index. A basic model is sufficient to produce a good tree structure.chat=: use the best model you can afford. The chat model searches the tree to retrieve information. See Query cost and accuracy.
See the Detailed Usage Guide to configure other models, or integrate PageIndex with your own agent.
Get Answers with Citations
To request inline page-level citations, pass a system message together with the question:
messages = [
{
"role": "system",
"content": (
'Cite only statements supported by tool outputs using '
'<cite doc="{docName}" page="{pageNumber}"/>'
),
},
{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize the document."},
]
answer = client.chat(messages, doc_id=doc_id)
The model fills in the document name and page number, for example:
Revenue increased during the reporting period. <cite doc="report.pdf" page="12"/>
Benchmarks
Indexing cost and time
Building a tree locally runs about $0.001 per page with index_model="gpt-5.6-luna", so a 1,000-page textbook costs a little over a dollar and a few minutes, once, and every later question reuses it. PageIndex is designed not to rely heavily on the model used at index time, so in our experiments a basic model does not hurt quality.
Indexing time also scales predictably with document length. In the same local setup, the benchmark documents (9 to 1,098 pages) finished in roughly 13 seconds to 4.5 minutes.
Query cost and accuracy
PageIndex-OSS-Benchmark measures exactly the setup in the quickstart above (PageIndexClient() in local mode, flash indexing, no OCR) on 62 lookup questions over 34 PDFs (1,945 pages) drawn from MMLongBench-Doc-V2. Every question’s answer is a fact stated in running text, so a wrong answer is a retrieval or reading failure, not a reasoning one.
Full results, data, and the runner are in the benchmark repo.
Detailed Usage Guide
⚙️ Step 1: Initialize the client
Create a local client and choose the models used for indexing and retrieval:
from pageindex import PageIndexClient
import os
client = PageIndexClient(
index_model="gpt-5.6-luna",
chat_model="gpt-5.6-sol",
storage_path=".pageindex",
)
-
index_modelbuilds the tree index. A basic model is sufficient. -
chat_modelsearches the tree and answers questions. Use the best model you can afford. -
storage_pathspecifies where indexed documents are stored locally.
index_model= / chat_model= are the flat spellings of the quickstart’s index= / chat=; either spelling works.
Model naming conventions
Model names follow LiteLLM’s naming convention. Choose the format that matches your provider:
OpenAI: use the model name directly and set OPENAI_API_KEY:
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-api-key"
chat_model = "gpt-5.6-sol"
Anthropic: prefix the model name with anthropic/ and set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY:
os.environ["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"] = "your-anthropic-api-key"
chat_model = "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6"
OpenRouter: prefix the provider and model name with openrouter/ and set OPENROUTER_API_KEY:
os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"] = "your-openrouter-api-key"
chat_model = "openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6"
For model names and API key settings for other providers, see the LiteLLM provider documentation.
🌲 Step 2: Build the tree index
submit_document defaults to Flash indexing: the structure is extracted from the PDF’s own layout (no LLM), and a model is called only for node summaries and the tree-optimization expansion pass. It takes seconds.
doc_id = client.submit_document("report.pdf")["doc_id"]
Inspect what you got:
tree = client.get_document_structure(doc_id) # titles, page ranges, summaries; no text
client.list_documents() # everything you have indexed
A PageIndex tree looks like a table of contents optimized for LLMs and agents:
{
"title": "Financial Stability",
"node_id": "0006",
"start_index": 21,
"end_index": 22,
"summary": "The Federal Reserve ...",
"nodes": [
{
"title": "Monitoring Financial Vulnerabilities",
"node_id": "0007",
"start_index": 22,
"end_index": 28,
"summary": "The Federal Reserve's monitoring ..."
},
{
"title": "Domestic and International Cooperation and Coordination",
"node_id": "0008",
"start_index": 28,
"end_index": 31,
"summary": "In 2023, the Federal Reserve collaborated ..."
}
]
}
See more example documents and generated tree structures.
💬 Step 3: Ask questions
chat() is the one-line surface. Underneath it is a document-QA agent, and you can talk to it over whichever protocol your stack already speaks:
Get a simple answer with chat():
client.chat("What changed in the risk factors?", doc_id=doc_id)
Pass a string or role/content history and get the answer back.
Stream the answer:
client.chat(question, doc_id=doc_id, stream=True)
Returns the answer as text chunks.
Use the OpenAI Chat Completions format:
client.chat_completions(messages, doc_id=doc_id)
Returns the full envelope, including token usage, streaming metadata, and finish_reason.
Use the OpenAI Responses format:
client.responses("...", doc_id=doc_id, reasoning={"effort": "high"})
Returns the agent’s process transcript in items. Append those items to the next call’s input to preserve memory and benefit from provider prompt caching. This requires a Responses-compatible backend in local mode.
Use the Anthropic Messages format:
client.messages("...", model="claude-sonnet-4-6", doc_id=doc_id)
Uses Anthropic’s native Messages API and tool runner. Install it with pip install 'pageindex[anthropic]'.
Pass a list of ids to doc_id to search several documents at once, and keep it identical across a conversation’s calls.
Integrate PageIndex with your own agent
Instead of calling PageIndex’s agent, hand PageIndex’s tools to yours. One call fills every slot:
OpenAI Agents SDK:
from agents import Agent, Runner
agent = Agent(**client.openai_agent_config(doc_id=doc_id))
result = Runner.run_sync(agent, "Summarize the auditor's concerns.")
openai_agent_config() provides the instructions and tools required by an OpenAI agent.
Anthropic SDK tool runner:
runner = anthropic_client.beta.messages.tool_runner(
**client.anthropic_runner_config(model="claude-sonnet-4-6", doc_id=doc_id),
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize the auditor's concerns."}],
)
anthropic_runner_config() configures Anthropic’s native tool runner. Install the integration with pip install 'pageindex[anthropic]'.
Claude Agent SDK:
options = ClaudeAgentOptions(**client.claude_agent_config(doc_id=doc_id))
claude_agent_config() creates the options for the Claude Agent SDK. Install the integration with pip install 'pageindex[claude]'.
Other agent frameworks:
tools = client.agent_tools()
agent_tools() returns plain Python functions that work with LangChain, PydanticAI, and other agent frameworks.
Each *_config helper is sugar over the explicit pieces (client.agent_instructions() for the system prompt, client.as_openai_tools() / as_anthropic_tools() / as_claude_mcp() for the tools), so you can swap in your own prompt whenever you need to. Locally, doc_id is enforced at the tool layer, not just prompted: out-of-scope lookups return NOT_FOUND.
PageIndex Cloud
The open-source version is ideal for text-heavy PDFs and local workflows. With PageIndex Cloud, document indexing and storage run in the cloud: PageIndex handles parsing, OCR, image understanding, tree-index construction, and managed storage for you. The chat and retrieval layer remains compatible with your model, so you can search the cloud-hosted index using the model provider your application already uses.
Moving indexing and storage from Local to Cloud only requires a PageIndex API key:
import os
from pageindex import PageIndexClient
os.environ["PAGEINDEX_API_KEY"] = "your-pageindex-key"
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-openai-key"
client = PageIndexClient(
index="cloud", # build and store the index in PageIndex Cloud
chat="gpt-5.6-sol", # use your preferred compatible model for chat
)
# The rest of your code stays the same (wait=True: cloud indexing is asynchronous)
doc_id = client.submit_document("report.pdf", wait=True)["doc_id"]
print(client.chat("What was the 2023 operating margin?", doc_id=doc_id))
| Capability | Local (this repo) | Cloud (get an API key) |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | text-heavy PDFs and local workflows | scanned, image-heavy, and large document collections |
| Indexing | runs locally | runs in PageIndex Cloud, with production OCR and image understanding |
| Storage | local | managed in PageIndex Cloud |
| Chat model | your model | your model, or the managed chat included with your key |
| Citations | page-level | line-level |
| Image understanding | — | ✅ |
| Multi-document scale | manual | PageIndex File System |
| MCP server | — | ✅ |
More About PageIndex Cloud
- Scale PageIndex to Millions of Documents: PageIndex File System is a Cloud-only, file-level tree indexing layer that lets PageIndex reason over an entire corpus, not just a single document.
Ready to Try It?
For dedicated deployment (VPC or on-premises), contact us or book a demo.
⭐ Support Us
Leave us a star 🌟 if you like our project. Thank you!
Please cite this work as:
Mingtian Zhang, Yu Tang and PageIndex Team,
"PageIndex: Next-Generation Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG",
PageIndex Blog, Sep 2025.
@article{zhang2025pageindex,
author = {Mingtian Zhang and Yu Tang and PageIndex Team},
title = {PageIndex: Next-Generation Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG},
journal = {PageIndex Blog},
year = {2025},
month = {September},
note = {https://pageindex.ai/blog/pageindex-intro},
}
Connect with Us
© 2026 Vectify AI